Wow. Two posts that were conceived within the same day that tie into previous Binks posts.
So, during the mandatory study session yesterday (from 7pm to 9pm weekdays, children under 16 have to be in the auditorium working/reading/etc. for two hours), two students said they had this logic puzzle. Basically, it consists of pointing at a random assortment of people, and saying “Bang” as you point at each one.
You then ask someone “Who’d I kill?” and they have to figure it out. They told me that the pattern could be determined by observation. So I start looking at it empirically. Is the person defined by the first letter of their first name? Is the person defined by the first letter of their last name? Is there a different pattern for an even number of people shot versus an odd number of people shot? Is there something different about the way people are shot? Is it about eye contact? The last person you see? The person who you maintain eye contact with after the fact?
Nothing worked. There was no empirical pattern. For 45 minutes or so, the conversation went:
“BANG BANG BANG, who’d I kill?” “Emma” “No. BANG BANG, who’d I kill?” “Melissa?” “No. BANG BANG BANG BANG BANG, who’d I kill?” “Me?” “No….”
And so forth. It continued like that for so long, infuriating me because even when they only pointed the gun at me and said BANG once, it was never me that was killed, and they wouldn’t tell me who was.
So, I was convinced that the true exercise of this game was to see how long someone would play along with the whole charade before giving up. So, I asked one of the two students to go to the other side of the room, and write down who it was that was killed. I figured that if the one student wrote the same answer that I said, and I was wrong, then I would have exposed the lie.
So, they do it again.
“BANG BANG BANG, who’d I kill?” “Me,” says I. “No,” says Student #1. Student #2 is laughing. On the piece of paper, she has written “You killed Jordan.” The lie is seemingly exposed. But they maintain that Student #2 is right but I was still wrong.
I’d like everyone to see if they can figure out what the answer is to this so called “logic puzzle”.
Are you ready?
Here…we…go.
Apparently, your answer is only correct when prefaced with the statement “You killed…”. If someone says, “BANG BANG BANG, who’d I kill?” and you respond with “Danger.”, you would be incorrect. If someone says, “BANG BANG BANG, who’d I kill?” and you respond with “You killed Danger.”, then you are correct.
This, to me, doesn’t seem like a logic puzzle. It seems like a matter of precision versus accuracy. Saying a name is an adequate answer to the question “Who’d I kill?” To expect an answer formatted a certain way is lunacy.
It is games like this (probably developed by Fine Arts students who think they are brilliant) that warp people’s understanding of instructions. For example, in a French class here, one of the teachers was trying to get students to repeat the word “Maison” (House). So, she told them to repeat after her, and to get them saying it in unison, she counted to three in French and they would then say it all together. This is how it went down:
Teacher: Okay. Repeat altogether. Un, deux, trois. Maison. Students: Un, deux, trois, maison. Teacher: No. Just say maison. Okay. On three. Un, deux, trois. Maison. Students: Un, deux, trois, maison.
And so it goes.
Exercises like this make people so paranoid about following things to the letter that they actually get things wrong while trying to be precise. Precision is retarded.
Can you imagine if, when you went to get some sort of government ID and they said, “What’s your birthday?”, saying “March 11, 1978” was an invalid answer. The clerk looks at you and snickers. “I’m sorry. That is not a valid answer to my question.”
You lose your place in line.
The next person is fortunate enough to respond with “My birthday is July 28, 1967.” and the clerk applauds like some sort of retarded seal. And then you go completely crazy, and punch the clerk in the face.
Ugh…I was so furious when I found out that that was the solution. It was so ridiculous.